Wealth advisors aiming to attract new clients currently without advisory services should prioritize clear communication regarding their fee structures, as suggested by Cerulli Associates' recent research. This transparency in disclosing costs and fees emerges as the principal barrier for affluent prospects contemplating engagement with financial advisors.
The study by Cerulli, a Boston-based research firm, reveals that 46% of potential clients perceive a lack of clarity in the cost structure, making it difficult to ascertain what they are being charged by their advisors. This issue outweighs other concerns, with 28% of respondents deeming advisors too costly, and 20% finding it challenging to locate a trustworthy advisor.
The complexity of compensation models for advisors and their firms, encompassing a range of methods from asset under management (AUM) fees to commissions and combined structures, complicates clients' understanding of financial advice costs. This complexity is a significant deterrent for potential clients, particularly the multitude of Americans who ventured into investing amid the pandemic and are now seeking professional financial guidance with a preference for a less direct involvement in investment decisions.
John McKenna, a research analyst at Cerulli, emphasizes the importance of advisors being forthcoming about their fee structures and the delivery of their advice. As investors shift from independent trading to seeking professional financial advice, they prioritize advisors who can clearly articulate the nature of their services and the associated costs.
The diversity in fee structures among financial advisors includes those who charge based on AUM, those who earn commissions, and others who utilize a combination of both for ongoing advisory services. Additionally, wealth management firms may receive compensation through various other channels, including revenue sharing agreements.
The study also points out the practice of adjusting fees based on the client's AUM, highlighting that a client with $750,000 in investable assets typically incurs an average advisory fee of 1.04% of AUM, with the average fee not dropping below 1% until the client's investment with the advisor reaches at least $1.5 million.
More Articles
GeoWealth’s UMA Platform Solves Private Markets’ Biggest Infrastructure Problem
GeoWealth is transforming wealth management by seamlessly integrating private and public markets into a single unified platform. Its UMA technology aims to solve the operational complexity of combining illiquid investments with daily portfolio management—to deliver institutional-grade sophistication with boutique-level customization. Backed by BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Apollo, GeoWealth enables RIAs to offer clients diversification through custom model portfolios, automated rebalancing, tax optimization, and scalable private markets access without sacrificing brand identity or operational efficiency.
Rethinking High Yield: The John Hancock High Yield ETF (JHHY) for Reclaiming Forfeited Returns
The John Hancock High Yield ETF (JHHY) from Manulife John Hancock Investments breaks traditional active vs. passive trade-offs with a dual approach: expressing sector views through liquid bonds while targeting opportunistic credit plays. Subadvisor Marathon Asset Management’s 20+ years of sector expertise drives monthly rebalancing, aiming for full high yield returns with benchmarked risk characteristics and low tracking error.