Direct indexing has been heralded as the next evolution in personalized investing. It offers the potential for flexibility, tax efficiency, and the ability to tailor portfolios to each client’s unique situation. And yet, despite all the momentum, adoption remains low.
The issue isn’t the strategy of direct indexing itself, it’s how it’s delivered.
In many firms, direct indexing operates as a point solution: separate from models, disconnected from planning, and difficult to manage consistently. What was meant to simplify personalization often ends up adding layers of operational complexity.
That’s why the right question shouldn’t be “Which provider offers the most customization?”; it’s “Which provider best supports how I serve clients?”
Because when direct indexing works as an embedded piece of your process, it stops existing as another product and becomes a part of your client experience.
To find that kind of alignment with direct indexing providers, advisors need to look beyond features and marketing claims. Here are five questions that can help you determine if a DI provider truly fits your firm:
1. How Does This Provider Fit Within My Investment Framework?
Direct indexing, combined with systematic trading, can deliver meaningful value through tax-loss harvesting and tax-efficient transitions. And, owning individual securities means that clients can avoid investing in companies that misalign with core values.
It’s a great story. One that a direct indexing provider is likely eager to have you start sharing with every client. But at many advisory firms, DI is often just one component of a complete investment lineup. Many advisory firms have various ETFs or mutual-fund based model solutions across equities, fixed income, and other asset classes.
If you already have a comprehensive investment management framework (meaning a logical way to map clients to models), consider asking your direct indexing provider to articulate exactly how DI fits into that framework. In other words:
- When you do provide DI, how does it fit next to other portfolio building blocks for the same client?
- Which clients should get DI and why?
2. What Operational Burden Will This Create?
For many advisors, the real cost of direct indexing isn’t in the fees, but the operational friction. Presuming you first embed DI in a clear, defensible way into your logic framework, how will your provider enable seamless implementation?
Often, providers require advisors to run DI in separate accounts. For example, if a client requires both direct indexing equity exposure as well as fixed income exposure, you may need two accounts to accommodate the DI provider to run the equities account separately from your fixed income model. That operational setup introduces a couple of problems:
- You will need to implement a separate account. That could mean back-and-forth emails with your direct indexing provider, all while your fixed income model account follows a separate workflow.
- You will need to oversee both in regards to asset allocation rebalancing, cash management, and other day-to-day management. If the equity portion of the portfolio increases enough to warrant a rebalance, for example, that might require you to request that the DI provider raise cash, which waterfalls into a number of other operational tasks. All for what should be a simple rebalance across asset class targets.
Over time, that complexity could steal hours from the work that actually builds relationships.
The right DI partner should aim to simplify your operations, not strain them. Automation, centralized dashboards, and clear workflows can help transform disorganized exceptions into consistency.
3. How Transparent Are the Rules and Recordkeeping?
In any investment process, clarity is what creates confidence for both advisors and clients. Yet many advisors struggle to explain the why behind their direct indexing activity: why a trade happened, how replacement securities were chosen, or what logic guided the decisions.
That uncertainty eats at trust over time. Clients want to know there’s a structure behind the strategy, and regulators expect documentation to match.
The right direct indexing provider doesn’t hide its process behind complexity. It makes decisions visible through clear rules, consistent recordkeeping, and accessible reporting. Transparency is equally about compliance and credibility.
Before choosing a provider, you’ll want to ask:
- Do you show the why behind actions?
- Can I access the rules framework or decision logs for my records?
Because if you can’t clearly explain it, you can’t confidently scale it.
4. How Does this Provider Enable Client Conversations?
Many providers can enable advisors with high-level storytelling about the benefits of tax-loss harvesting, but not much else that might be more specific to each client. What separates an advisor in a client’s eyes is how clearly you can connect the dots between their specific situation and the solution you provide.
A human-first DI provider gives you language, context, and tools that turn numbers into narratives to bring to client conversations. It helps surface what matters most to each client.
For example:
- In scenarios where capital gains mitigation is a priority, can your provider tell you how DI is enabling a tax-efficient transition to a more diversified equity exposure?
- If values are important, can it tell you how their portfolio reflects those priorities?
By asking these questions, you can make sure your direct indexing systems are designed to scale not only your business, but the humanity behind it.
5. Is This Built for Scale, or For Specialists?
Personalization doesn’t require a doctorate in portfolio engineering. However, DI solutions assume advisors have the time, or desire, to become technicians.
We believe the benefits of DI aren’t derived from creating new hyper-specific indices around a market thesis, but some emerging providers are offering customization capabilities that enable advisor tinkering rather than actual client benefits.
As your provider, they should be able to articulate how they plan to empower you with automation, clarity, and a consistent process so personalization happens through the system and does not require constant hands-on effort. Scalable technology should power your process in the background while you stay focused on the human-centered interactions.Ultimately, when technology handles the heavy lifting, advisors have more room to do what only humans can do: connect, guide, and build trust with clients.
.
Integration is the Real Differentiator
Direct indexing has evolved from an investment tactic into a defining test of how modern advisors deliver personalized solutions to their clients.
Effective DI providers go beyond optimizing portfolios to operationalize personalization. They turn complexity into repeatable workflows that demonstrate clear logic and frameworks that can be shared with clients.
When direct indexing is fully integrated into your planning, communication, and client experience, it goes from being another layer of technology to structural support for human connection at scale.
Explore how Seeds brings direct indexing into a unified experience that supports both operational excellence and human-first advice.
