Stephen Moore: Why Trump Needs Tax Cut 2.0

(Washington Times) Every single plausible Democratic candidate for president has endorsed tax increases as centerpieces of their economic agenda. Think about what we are hearing from Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Punch and Judy Show. New wealth taxes, carbon taxes, energy taxes, higher death and income taxes with rates up to 70%. Payroll taxes would rise to pay for Social Security benefit expansions and Medicare for All.

I remember a time when liberal Michael Dukakis, when running against George H.W. Bush, declared he would only raise taxes as “a last resort.” Now Democrats think raising taxes on employers, investors, companies and the wealthy is some kind of badge of honor and the option of first resort. They also recite a few outlier economists who tell them what they want to hear: Tax rates of 50% to 70% or more won’t hurt the economy at all. Yes, and Elizabeth Warren is of Indian descent.

Meanwhile, Trump and the Republicans in Congress have the 2017 tax cut to trumpet — a reform that by almost any objective measure has worked better for workers and middle-class families than we even expected. Middle-class incomes have hit an all-time high as has the stock market and employment. Tax revenues are also higher than ever before — with the tax cut in place.

But voters are always wondering what comes next. Trump and the Republicans need a new tax cut plan — just as a rock ’n’ roll band whose album has just gone platinum needs a new album out next year.

Democrats are so open about their lust for higher taxes, and that makes the case for a Republican tax cut even stronger. In politics it is always wise to paint in bright colors.

What would a new tax plan look like? I’m a big fan of the Steve Forbes’ 18% post card flat tax. That’s probably too big and bold for now. Trump has said he wants any new tax cut to be aimed at the middle class. So here are some practical ideas that could help the economy and would benefit working-class Americans:

1) Tax-free savings accounts. My Heritage colleague Adam Michel has been pitching an idea that would allow Americans with incomes of below $150,000 or so to deduct up $10,000 each year from their taxable income if they put the money into savings. This would raise national saving, provide a bigger pool of money available for investment and allow millions of Americans to own more stock.

Given that most middle-class families have very low levels of savings, this would also acculturate Americans to squirrel away more money every year and watch the power of compound interest raise their lifetime wealth.

2) Reduce tax rates on the middle class to 15%. This is an idea that National Economic Council director Larry Kudlow has floated. It reduces rates from 22% to 15% for those in the middle income range, which will modestly offer greater work incentives for millions of families while allowing people to keep more of their earnings.

3) Capital gains rollover. This would change the way we tax capital gains income. Currently, if you own a stock like IBM and want to sell it at a gain of, say, $50,000, but you take those gains and buy stock in Uber, you have to pay a near 24% tax on the $50,000. But all you’ve done is rearrange your portfolio of stocks; you haven’t really realized a gain in your income that you can spend.

This perversely locks in investment, because people stay in old stocks and steer away from investing in new startup companies in order to avoid the capital gains tax. Under this “rollover” proposal, capital gains would be paid only when the money is withdrawn from the stock market entirely.

4) Private accounts for Social Security. Allow workers to put some small — perhaps 2% — of their payroll taxes into a private and personal retirement account. These accounts would be invested in the index funds of all stocks. This would allow much higher lifetime returns from this money than conventional Social Security would offer. It would allow every participating American — including tens of millions of minimum-wage workers — to become shareholders and own a piece of the rock.

These are all proposals that let Americans keep more of what Elizabeth Warren calls their “hard-earned money.” Let the liberals spend the next 11 months trying to explain why higher taxes and lower take-home pay is better for families than lower taxes and MORE take-home pay. That should be fascinating to watch.

Stephen Moore is the Distinguished Visiting Fellow for Project for Economic Growth at The Heritage Foundation. This piece originally appeared in The Washington Times.


More Articles