(SAM) We’ve previously made the case that direct indexes are better than ETFs and mutual funds, and that this will lead to a large shift of assets from ETFs and mutual funds to direct indexes. Even mutual fund companies have told us that “mutual funds are dead” (See blog posts from our parent company, Smartleaf, Inc: Mutual Funds Are Dead and Direct Indexes are Better than ETFs). But displacing ETFs and mutual funds is just the beginning. Direct indexes will also change who manages portfolios, how they are managed — even the core value proposition of wealth managers.
It all starts with direct indexes replacing ETFs and mutual funds. But, like falling dominoes, each change leads to another: the rise of outsourcing, the rise of total outsourcing, the rise of customization and tax management, and a change in the role of the advisor. Let’s take these one at a time.
The rise of outsourcing
You don’t reap the tax and customization benefits of direct indexing just by owning the individual stocks. A direct index needs to be managed. It’s too complex for individual advisors to do on their own at scale, so advisors will outsource the job to specialists.
The rise of total outsourcing
If you embrace direct indexing, you’re buying into the advantages of tax management. But taxes are a feature of portfolios as a whole, not one section of it, and proper tax management requires coordinated management of the entire portfolio. So, if you’re outsourcing the management of the direct index, you should outsource the management of the whole portfolio. There may be a single direct index core or there might be several direct indexes for multiple asset classes, with ETFs and mutual funds for peripheral asset classes. All should be tax managed together, and all of this should be outsourced.
The rise of customization and tax management
Customization and tax management are not new ideas, but, as a practical matter, they were previously mostly for ultra-high-net-worth investors. They are now becoming a commodity. Once portfolio rebalancing is outsourced, there are no barriers to advisors offering customization and tax management to every investor. This means:
- Every account can have ESG or religious screens.
- Every account can have risk customization. (e.g. if you work for Exxon, eliminate energy stocks from the portfolio)
- Every account can have tax-smart transitioning, year-round loss harvesting and risk-compensating gains deferral.
The rise of a new value proposition: the advisor as financial coach
Outsourcing the day-to-day management of the portfolio does not mean forfeiting customization and tax management. On the contrary, reaping the advantages of customization and tax management is one of the driving forces behind outsourcing. But outsourcing does do away with old-style value propositions based on trade-by-trade conversations with clients. It replaces the endless quest for market-beating performance with solid, customized, low-cost, tax efficient investing, which becomes a backdrop for the advisor's main role — acting as the investor’s financial coach and guide.
We’ve used the metaphor of falling dominoes to describe the follow-on impact of the adoption of direct indexes. Of course, all this assumes the first domino falls — that direct indexes will, in fact, replace ETFs and mutual funds. The rationale for this is pretty straightforward — direct indexes are customizable and outperform ETFs on an after-tax expected basis, and this will create immense pressure for adoption. Everything else follows.
