Some people are saying direct indexing is nothing but expensive hype designed to push HNW efficiencies on portfolios too small to really support or justify anything but the random walk. We beg to differ. With a direct indexing guide on the horizon, we're obviously convinced that this is the future. But what do YOU think?
A lot of high-profile players in the industry have raised the banner and are proudly announcing that they're ready to help advisors make the leap. Just the other day, for example, Josh Brown was telling me how good it felt that Ritholtz had bit the bullet and deconstructed its client exposure to mass-market ETFs.
That's a $3 billion firm. And elsewhere in the landscape, you've got Morgan Stanley and BlackRock and Pershing and Schwab and Natixis and Morningstar and Vestmark lining up . . . name after name, all grabbing their piece of the conversation.
But buried in all those announcements, the fundamentals get lost. Maybe you're still a little woozy on the essential aspects of what direct indexing is all about. About 70% of the advisors we surveyed on the topic admit that they don't really get the "why" or the "how" or even the "what" going on here.
August 20, 2023
More Articles
Seeds: Direct Indexing Starts with Understanding the Client, Not the Capabilities
Direct indexing offers powerful capabilities—tax-loss harvesting, values-based screening, concentrated position management. But Zach Conway, CEO and Founder of Seeds, argues the conversation often stops at the advisor level. The client gets a pitch deck without clarity about how the solution fits their situation. Seeds aims to flip the script by starting with deep client understanding before determining which product solutions make sense. The framework helps advisors answer a simpler question: who should get direct indexing, and why?
Last Month Was The Worst January For Layoff Plans Since 2009: Challenger
Layoff announcements ballooned in January, hitting the highest level for the month since 2009.