Wealth advisors aiming to attract new clients currently without advisory services should prioritize clear communication regarding their fee structures, as suggested by Cerulli Associates' recent research. This transparency in disclosing costs and fees emerges as the principal barrier for affluent prospects contemplating engagement with financial advisors.
The study by Cerulli, a Boston-based research firm, reveals that 46% of potential clients perceive a lack of clarity in the cost structure, making it difficult to ascertain what they are being charged by their advisors. This issue outweighs other concerns, with 28% of respondents deeming advisors too costly, and 20% finding it challenging to locate a trustworthy advisor.
The complexity of compensation models for advisors and their firms, encompassing a range of methods from asset under management (AUM) fees to commissions and combined structures, complicates clients' understanding of financial advice costs. This complexity is a significant deterrent for potential clients, particularly the multitude of Americans who ventured into investing amid the pandemic and are now seeking professional financial guidance with a preference for a less direct involvement in investment decisions.
John McKenna, a research analyst at Cerulli, emphasizes the importance of advisors being forthcoming about their fee structures and the delivery of their advice. As investors shift from independent trading to seeking professional financial advice, they prioritize advisors who can clearly articulate the nature of their services and the associated costs.
The diversity in fee structures among financial advisors includes those who charge based on AUM, those who earn commissions, and others who utilize a combination of both for ongoing advisory services. Additionally, wealth management firms may receive compensation through various other channels, including revenue sharing agreements.
The study also points out the practice of adjusting fees based on the client's AUM, highlighting that a client with $750,000 in investable assets typically incurs an average advisory fee of 1.04% of AUM, with the average fee not dropping below 1% until the client's investment with the advisor reaches at least $1.5 million.
More Articles
Beyond the Narrative Fallacy: Hull Tactical’s HTUS for Disciplined Quantitative Execution
Hull Tactical’s HTUS ETF combines rigorous quantitative analysis with adaptive market timing to capture alpha while managing volatility. The fund exploits options pricing inefficiencies, abandons narrative-driven investing for data-based decisions, and maintains flexible systematic execution. Led by experienced financial engineers, HTUS delivers tactical S&P 500 exposure through disciplined behavioral finance principles and proven quantitative models.
Symmetry Partners’ SMOM ETF: A Systematic Strategy Enters the ETF Arena
Symmetry Partners debuts SMOM ETF, transforming the firm’s proven sector rotation strategy from SMA to ETF format. The fund uses dual momentum signals across six- and 12-month timeframes to select top-performing S&P 500 sectors, rebalancing monthly with staggered schedules. Designed as a satellite allocation to complement core equity exposure, SMOM aims to offer enhanced tax efficiency and smoother execution than its SMA predecessor, backed by seven years of track record.