In today's era of side hustles, should RIAs and broker-dealers be required to supervise every outside activity their affiliated advisors pursue—even those completely unrelated to finance?
FINRA is signaling that perhaps they shouldn’t.
As part of a broader review of its regulatory framework, FINRA is inviting feedback on a proposed update to its rules governing outside business activities (OBAs) and private securities transactions (PSTs). The goal: reduce unnecessary compliance burdens while strengthening focus on activities that could genuinely impact investors.
Under the proposal, FINRA aims to deprioritize side gigs that are clearly unrelated to an advisor’s investment business. Instead, it proposes a sharper focus on “outside investment-related activities that may pose a greater risk to the investing public and members,” as FINRA describes.
“This approach will enhance investor protection while reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens by eliminating the reporting of low-risk activities that generate white noise,” FINRA notes. Examples include bartending, driving for a rideshare company, or officiating sports events—none of which would typically raise investor protection concerns.
The proposed shift would instead prioritize the disclosure of business activities that may intersect with an advisor’s wealth management responsibilities. This includes work involving crypto assets, commodities, annuities, or private placements—especially when conducted outside the advisor’s primary firm.
Advisors would still be required to disclose specific outside activities and securities transactions to their firm. Firms, in turn, would evaluate whether the activity was properly characterized, involved existing clients, or could be reasonably viewed as an extension of the advisor’s role.
This new initiative revisits an earlier 2018 attempt by FINRA to narrow the scope of broker oversight rules, which ultimately stalled before final implementation. Now, with industry evolution and the rise of decentralized finance and gig work, FINRA appears ready to revisit the issue.
For RIAs, the implications could be significant. Less time spent tracking non-investment-related side work means more bandwidth to focus on activities that truly pose a risk to client portfolios or firm reputations.
FINRA is seeking public comment from member firms and stakeholders on how this rule consolidation could affect compliance practices, and whether alternative approaches should be considered.
Comments are due by May 13.
More Articles
How Sterling Trustees Aligns with Advisors—and Avoids the Bank Trust Conflict
Sterling Trustees combines fixed-fee independence, proprietary Salesforce-based technology, and advisor-first service to streamline trust administration and eliminate the conflicts that often plague traditional trust companies. The firm delivers same-day distributions, automated trust committee decisions, and comprehensive support for complex assets—from art and racehorses to private equity—while helping advisors navigate the $84 trillion generational wealth transfer with 80% client retention rates through strategic trust structures.
The Case for Bitcoin, Deregulated Banks, and a Reset U.S. Market Cycle: Insights from Wellington-Altus
Wellington-Altus’s Jim Thorne outlines why advisors should rethink digital assets, regional banks, and the current market cycle, arguing that a structural shift in credit, policy, and purchasing power is already well underway. He views Bitcoin as legitimate portfolio protection against 8% annual money supply growth, sees deregulated regional banks driving localized lending and economic growth, and believes April’s correction reset the typical four-year market cycle, potentially setting up significant gains ahead.