Commentary on The New York Times article by Patricia Cohen Steven J. Oshins, a Nevada lawyer who specializes in estate planning, has never met the wealthy software entrepreneur Dan Kloiber, but he is nonetheless intensely interested in Mr. Kloiber's contentious divorce.
"I have had a Google news alert on that for a couple years," Mr. Oshins said as he discussed the case from his office in a squat pink complex about a 20-minute drive from the Las Vegas Strip. What animates Mr. Oshins is not the juicy marital feud, but the legal arcana governing a trust in Delaware where the Kloiber family parked assets worth hundreds of million of dollars, sheltered from estate taxes. Mr. Oshins, with a gleeful grin spreading across his face, relished the thought of the no-longer-beloved Mrs. Kloiber busting through the trust and exposing a potential chink in the formidable trust protection armor promised by Delaware — which just happens to fiercely compete with Nevada for the lucrative business of shielding assets owned by the superrich. Read more from the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/business/states-vie-to-protect-the-wealth-of-the-1-percent.html
August 9, 2016
More Articles
Morgan Stanley Sees $16 Trillion Market Upside from AI—but Warns of Major Workforce Disruption
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept—it is becoming the most consequential driver of business transformation in decades.
Amplify: Why It’s Time for Legacy Risk Models to R.I.P.
For decades, financial risk modeling has been based on standard deviation assumptions, such as the Gaussian Distribution, modern portfolio theory, and bell curve risk models. While this approach works great in fields like science, it has shown significant shortcomings during extreme market events. Why?