Morgan Stanley is mandated to compensate over $3 million to a cohort of financial advisors, following accusations that the firm unjustly retained their deferred earnings upon their departure to join competing entities, as decreed by an arbitration panel.
This assembly of 10 advisors contended that Morgan Stanley contravened New York labor statutes and failed in its fiduciary obligations concerning the firm's compensation arrangements, as disclosed in their arbitration verdict dated March 22. They argued that Morgan Stanley wrongfully mandated the surrender of earnings, breaching the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Alan Rosca, the attorney for the advisors, stated, "These advisors rightfully earned their compensation during their tenure at Morgan Stanley, which, we argued, had a compensation scheme not in alignment with ERISA."
The arbitration panel instructed Morgan Stanley to reimburse the advisors for their deferred earnings, in addition to interest and legal expenses.
In response, a Morgan Stanley spokesperson articulated the firm's disagreement with the Chicago-based arbitration panel's resolution, committing to the defense against similar allegations.
"Morgan Stanley consistently provides deferred compensation to financial advisors as an appreciation for their loyalty and stewardship," the spokesperson remarked. "This is distinct from a retirement plan, a perspective upheld by previous arbitration panels, making the recent panel's conclusion debatable. We are prepared to fervently challenge any baseless claims to the contrary."
The claimants named in the arbitration include Alfredo Serrano, Brian Thomas, Daniel G. Raupp, Denanne Heil, Gary Phelps, Henry Enno, Jeff Schimmelpfennig, Manfred Hegwer, Michael Bruner, and Scott Weissman, all former employees at Morgan Stanley across various Illinois locations. From 2017 to 2022, they transitioned to roles at competitors such as Stifel Financial, LPL Financial, and Oppenheimer, as recorded by BrokerCheck, a database upheld by the industry's self-regulatory body, Finra.
In 2022, these advisors initiated claims against Morgan Stanley. Following a concise four-day hearing session in February, the arbitration trio ruled in their favor.
This case signifies just one among many challenges Morgan Stanley faces, as the firm addresses similar reimbursement disputes from approximately 150 financial advisors, as reported by Rosca, whose firm, Rosca Scarlato, represents these advisors in arbitration proceedings against Morgan Stanley. According to Rosca, these claims are being pursued either individually or in groups, facilitated by the firm's offices in Cleveland and Philadelphia.
"We are fully engaged in managing these cases," Rosca noted, emphasizing that the advisors are mandated to resolve disputes through arbitration, as per their employment contracts with Morgan Stanley.
April 7, 2024
More Articles
Custom Separately Managed Accounts: 4 Key Use Cases Where Custom SMAs Offer Clear Benefits
Custom SMAs can be tailored to personal investment goals, adjusting their holdings to suit a variety of investment styles and preferences while remaining focused on tax planning and tax management.
The Unique Value of Custom SMAs
Advisors face stiff competition in the race to meet rising investor expectations, putting a premium on scale and differentiation. The rise of direct indexing has shone a spotlight on the potential for customized separately managed accounts (custom SMAs) to help in this effort.