Interactive Brokers, an online brokerage firm, has reported a $48 million loss due to a glitch at the New York Stock Exchange that caused a dramatic, brief plunge in Berkshire Hathaway’s share price by more than 99%.
On June 3, Berkshire Hathaway’s Class A shares plummeted from approximately $622,000 to $185. Although trading was quickly halted, news of the price drop rapidly circulated on social media, Interactive Brokers announced in a news release. Despite the significant loss, the firm stated that it would not materially affect its financial condition.
Shares of Interactive Brokers rose slightly by 0.1% to $123.16 on Thursday afternoon.
The sudden drop in Berkshire’s share price appeared as an attractive opportunity to many traders, resulting in a surge of buy orders. Interactive Brokers noted that buyers expected their orders to be filled at the $185 price point.
When the NYSE resumed trading later in the morning, Berkshire’s share price was set at $648,000. Interactive Brokers criticized the NYSE for reopening trading without addressing the significant order imbalance created during the halt.
The NYSE, owned by Intercontinental Exchange, declined to comment on the incident.
Due to the influx of pending buy orders, Berkshire’s shares skyrocketed to $741,971.39 within 98 seconds. Many clients who placed buy orders during the trading pause saw their orders filled as the price surged, with some paying the peak price.
Interactive Brokers filed a “clearly erroneous execution” petition with the NYSE and other exchanges to annul the trades executed at the excessively high prices during the chaotic market conditions post-trading resumption.
The NYSE did not immediately respond to the petition and later denied it after trading closed, Interactive Brokers reported.
As a result, Interactive Brokers decided to directly reimburse its clients as a goodwill gesture and sought compensation from the stock exchange, which was denied earlier this week.
Currently, Interactive Brokers is absorbing the $48 million loss but indicated the possibility of legal action to recover the funds.
“Interactive Brokers is continuing to consider its options for recovering these amounts, including any potential legal claims against NYSE or related entities,” the firm stated.
More Articles
The Case for Bitcoin, Deregulated Banks, and a Reset U.S. Market Cycle: Insights from Wellington-Altus
Wellington-Altus’s Jim Thorne outlines why advisors should rethink digital assets, regional banks, and the current market cycle, arguing that a structural shift in credit, policy, and purchasing power is already well underway. He views Bitcoin as legitimate portfolio protection against 8% annual money supply growth, sees deregulated regional banks driving localized lending and economic growth, and believes April’s correction reset the typical four-year market cycle, potentially setting up significant gains ahead.
Private Markets with Purpose: How Fiduciary Trust International Approaches Alternatives with Clarity and Discipline
Amid the flood of alternative investment products, Fiduciary Trust International cuts through marketing noise with methodical discipline. Erick Rawlings and his team treat private equity, hedge funds, and real assets as essential portfolio building blocks—not side bets. With manager selection dispersion reaching 60% in venture capital, rigorous due diligence becomes critical. Rawlings emphasizes aligning client intentions with long-term commitments, viewing alternatives as strategic tools rather than magic bullets for targeted outcomes.