Berkshire Hathaway's real estate brokerage HomeServices of America has reached a settlement of $250 million in a lawsuit concerning its commission fees, according to the plaintiffs involved in the litigation.
Home sellers initiated the lawsuit against HomeServices, claiming that the company participated in a scheme that compelled sellers to pay excessively high agent commissions.
Plaintiff attorney Benjamin D. Brown, managing partner of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll and co-chair of its Antitrust practice, emphasized the importance of the settlement. "This marks a significant progress for American home sellers burdened with billions in unnecessary commission expenses," Brown stated. "It moves us closer to concluding this protracted case surrounding the widespread brokers' commission scheme."
In response, HomeServices' Executive Vice President Chris Kelly told Business Insider that the decision to settle was made to "avoid the uncertainties of continued appeals and litigation."
Kelly affirmed, "Looking ahead, we are committed to maintaining ethical standards, upholding industry integrity, and providing value. We remain dedicated to supporting our agents in building careers that make a positive impact on the communities and consumers they serve."
Additionally, this group of home sellers has also pursued claims against other brokerages, achieving substantial settlements, including a notable $418 million from the National Association of Realtors, which has significantly impacted the real estate industry.
April 26, 2024
More Articles
Jilted Barney’s Heir Claims His Dead Mother and Siblings Masterminded $20 Million Tax Fraud Scheme: Lawsuit
An heir to the now-defunct luxury department store Barney’s is accusing his late mother and siblings of orchestrating a tax fraud scheme.
Pacer Reimagines Equity Income: How QDPL and QSIX Dividend Multiplier ETFs Capture Abandoned Returns
Pacer’s QDPL and QSIX ETFs use dividend futures to deliver 4x and 6x dividend yields while maintaining ~90% equity exposure—eliminating the traditional trade-off between growth and income. By recapturing dividends abandoned in derivatives strategies, these funds might offer income-focused investors a compelling alternative to covered calls or sector concentration, aiming to generate compelling annual distributions with reduced volatility.