Direct indexing has been having its moment for a few years now, but the gap between the concept and a genuinely well-executed implementation is wider than people might realize. Building a personalized basket of securities, maintaining portfolio alignment intelligently over time, harvesting losses systematically, and delivering all of the potential benefits through a transparent and advisor-friendly infrastructure is harder than it sounds. Leigh Eichel, Co-Founder and CEO at Alpha Vee Solutions, has dedicated his career to getting every one of those pieces right—and the firm he built reflects just how seriously he takes this approach.
Alpha Vee operates at the intersection of investment research and financial technology, working exclusively with registered investment advisors and TAMP providers. The firm builds and maintains proprietary indexes, delivers them through direct indexing structures across a wide range of wealth technology platforms, and provides advisors the kind of transparency and control that most off-the-shelf products simply can’t match. Together, those capabilities add up to a direct indexing offering that goes well beyond putting a client’s name on a basket of stocks.
In conversation with The Wealth Advisor, Eichel walks through what makes Alpha Vee’s approach distinctive—from index construction and tax-loss harvesting to risk management and the broadening market opportunity advisors should be paying attention to right now.
Owning the Index Changes Everything
Most direct indexing providers license external benchmarks and build portfolios around them, which creates limitations that are easy to overlook until they matter. Alpha Vee builds and maintains its underlying indexes—giving advisors and their clients something most platforms quietly can’t offer.
Because the firm controls the index methodology end-to-end, the research stays live, traceable, and updatable. Advisors retain ownership of the index history on behalf of their clients, which preserves full continuity even if a platform relationship changes. And because Alpha Vee publishes its methodology openly—fact sheets, audit reports, and live performance data are all available on alphavee.com—advisors can readily explain what their clients own and why.
“We’re very proud,” Eichel says of his firm’s methodology. “It’s very data driven. It’s unbiased, unemotional.” The same commitment to data integrity is what gives Eichel confidence when competitors take notice. “We’re not afraid of someone copying our approach,” he adds. “We know what it takes to generate these signals.”
The transparency extends to how clients can track their portfolios. Index performance is available intraday through tools such as CNBC and Morningstar, which turns what can easily feel like a black box into something visible and explainable. When a client calls during a volatile stretch and wants to understand what’s happening in their account, having a live, trackable index to point to is a meaningful advantage during tough conversations.
Tax-Loss Harvesting With Teeth
The tax alpha story is one of the most compelling reasons advisors gravitate toward direct indexing in the first place—and Alpha Vee’s structure is built to deliver on it. Because clients hold individual securities rather than fund shares, advisors retain full discretion to harvest losses at the position level throughout the year, offsetting gains elsewhere in a client’s portfolio without disrupting the overall strategy.
The key here is advisor ownership of the process. Alpha Vee delivers the index and the research; the advisor controls the execution. That means tax-loss harvesting decisions stay with the fiduciary who knows the client’s full tax picture, rather than being handled by an algorithm that sees only one account. Eichel sees the fiduciary relationship as central to how direct indexing should work—”there’s a lot of benefits to this approach for the fiduciary of the account,” he says, and the tax-loss harvesting capability is chief among them.
For high-net-worth clients with complex tax situations, advisor-controlled harvesting decisions are genuinely difficult to replicate inside a fund structure.
A Strategy Suite Built for the Moment
The direct indexing wrapper is only as valuable as the investment strategy inside it—and Alpha Vee’s risk-managed suite is where the firm’s research depth shows its strongest value. Strategies span large cap, small and midcap (SMID), all cap, midcap, and small cap, each built on the same foundational methodology—identifying the five sectors most likely to accelerate over the coming quarter from the 10 classic sectors, selecting individual names within those sectors and incorporating a dynamic Treasuries component that adjusts based on the inflation environment.
Right now, the breadth of the strategy suite feels particularly well-timed. Small and midcap stocks have surged to lead the market in early 2026, with large-cap growth meaningfully lagging—a reversal that reflects years of pent-up undervaluation finally finding its moment.
“It’s been a long time, by the way. SMID has underperformed, but what’s coming up right behind it, the small-cap space, they’re hot until they’re not, and they haven’t been hot for quite a while,” Eichel says. “And wow, the last number of trading sessions was quite good.”
For advisors managing clients still concentrated in large-cap funds and high-flying AI names, the direct indexing structure can make reallocation considerably more tax-efficient. Rather than triggering a taxable event by selling a fund, advisors can transition into a personalized direct index gradually, managing the tax impact of the transition while moving toward a better-diversified, risk-managed allocation. Eichel sees the current environment as a genuine inflection point—and doesn’t mince words about what he thinks advisors should be doing.
“I would highly encourage them to start moving into something risk managed,” he says. “What the next shoe is to drop—whether it’s geopolitical, whether it’s our debt, the weakening dollar—there’s a lot of larger changes afoot. Staying concentrated in a few names, even if they’re highly appreciated names, may make sense to reconsider and start looking at some of these kinds of risk-managed strategies from Alpha Vee.”
The performance data backs up Eichel’s thinking. “We’re seeing very, very strong performance in the SMID space,” he notes. “And then when I go to the small caps and do the exact same thing, it’s the same kind of picture. It’s starting to move really quick. So, we are big believers in diversification and having a large cap and a SMID paired up together.”
The Risk Management Layer Most Products Skip
Alpha Vee’s strategies are designed around a deliberate and explicit balancing of growth and risk management, which Eichel thinks the industry undervalues.
“There’s a trade-off between CAGR and standard deviation, the volatility, and that’s the yin and the yang of this,” he says. “And I’m happy to get a little bit less performance, but for that, I want to trade off for less volatility, and that’s to give the client a ride that they can stay on.”
Part of what makes that compromise land with clients is how Eichel frames it. He’s intentional about meeting advisors where they are—working through the conversation with them rather than handing down a strategy. “I try and educate, encourage, come up with different thought processes for different client scenarios,” he says. The starting point, more often than not, is managing expectations. “Most clients, I think retail clients that they work with, want very high returns with no risk, which is impossible. So, you have to come up with a way for people to understand we’re going to have solid returns and shoot for that and do our best possible research to achieve that, but we’re going to have lower-than-market volatility.”
Every risk-managed strategy carries an embedded Treasuries component—not for income, but to moderate volatility. When inflation is elevated, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) replace seven-to-10-year intermediaries automatically, giving the portfolio a macro-aware risk management layer that many direct indexing products don’t bother to build. All strategies rebalance quarterly, aiming to keep sector allocations current and ensure the portfolio reflects the latest signals rather than stale positioning from a previous quarter.
The recommended holding period across all strategies is three to five years, and Eichel has a useful framing for how to set client expectations around evaluation frequency: tell them to check in about as often as they check their home value. “Don’t stare at them every day,” he says. “It’s just how risk-managed strategies have to work. You need time because there’s a lot going on.”
The compounding logic behind his advice is simple—a smoother ride that clients stay invested in is preferable to a wilder one they abandon at the wrong moment.
Platform Access and Account Minimums
Accessibility is one of the more underappreciated parts of Alpha Vee’s direct indexing story. Strategies are available across a wide range of wealth technology platforms—Schwab, Smartleaf Asset Management, FusionIQ, Amplify, Advyzon, Qdeck, Quorus, C8 Technologies, and intelliflo, among others—meaning advisors can typically access Alpha Vee’s models without leaving their existing technology stack.
The all-cap strategy, which uses sector ETFs to deliver broad-market exposure across thousands of underlying holdings, carries a minimum account size of just $5,000. When skeptics push back on performance, Eichel’s answer is consistent. “I always defer back to the results,” he says. “They speak for themselves.” The track record across the strategy suite is what he points to when advisors need to make the case to clients—“not to beat up at all on all-cap ETFs,” he adds, “but someone that bought way back in 2019 and had their registered investment advisor working with us and taking this kind of research in and deploying those portfolios—I think very solid returns.”
For advisors looking to extend direct indexing benefits to a broader segment of their client base—not just the top tier of high-net-worth relationships—that kind of accessibility changes the conversation considerably. “We only work with advisors, licensed advisors,” Eichel adds, and every part of the platform—the research, the marketing materials, the model portfolios—is designed around the advisor-client relationship specifically.
The Bigger Picture
Direct indexing done well is about more than personalization and tax efficiency, though Alpha Vee delivers meaningfully on both. It’s about giving advisors a genuinely better way to implement disciplined, research-driven investment strategies—with full transparency, real tax alpha, and the kind of control that a fund structure will never allow.
Alpha Vee’s two business lines reinforce each other in a way that’s worth appreciating. The investment research side builds and maintains the indexes; the software platform gives advisors and institutions the infrastructure to act on them. The direct indexes advisors access through their preferred platforms and the hardcore portfolio construction workstation for institutional users are products of the same underlying research engine—which means the sophistication advisors can have at hand isn’t a simplified consumer version of something built for someone else.
The direct indexing market is maturing, and the question of how institutional-quality strategies eventually reach more investors remains open. “Maybe it’s time that they become public products,” Eichel says. “But for now, you have to go to your registered investment advisor. They’re our clients, and we give them the best possible research and marketing materials that we can provide.” That commitment to the advisor relationship—over shortcuts, over scale for its own sake—makes Alpha Vee worth a serious look.
_____________________
