Commentary on The New York Times article by Patricia Cohen Steven J. Oshins, a Nevada lawyer who specializes in estate planning, has never met the wealthy software entrepreneur Dan Kloiber, but he is nonetheless intensely interested in Mr. Kloiber's contentious divorce.
"I have had a Google news alert on that for a couple years," Mr. Oshins said as he discussed the case from his office in a squat pink complex about a 20-minute drive from the Las Vegas Strip. What animates Mr. Oshins is not the juicy marital feud, but the legal arcana governing a trust in Delaware where the Kloiber family parked assets worth hundreds of million of dollars, sheltered from estate taxes. Mr. Oshins, with a gleeful grin spreading across his face, relished the thought of the no-longer-beloved Mrs. Kloiber busting through the trust and exposing a potential chink in the formidable trust protection armor promised by Delaware — which just happens to fiercely compete with Nevada for the lucrative business of shielding assets owned by the superrich. Read more from the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/business/states-vie-to-protect-the-wealth-of-the-1-percent.html
August 9, 2016
More Articles
Grayscale Outlines Top Crypto Investing Themes For 2026 As Institutional Adoption Grows
Grayscale says the crypto asset class remains in a sustained bull market heading into 2026, supported by macro demand and regulatory clarity.
Smartleaf’s Zero-Effort Revolution: How True Automation Frees Advisors from Portfolio Management
Many advisors assume personalization at scale requires heavy lifting. Jerry Michael, President at Smartleaf and Smartleaf Asset Management, believes this premise is mistaken. True automation doesn’t just make portfolio management faster—it can take on any operational friction. From tax optimization to direct indexing and ESG screens, complexity should add zero incremental effort. Michael explains how automation reclaims advisor time for relationship building and why the industry should demand more from technology.