Nvidia’s dominance in the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution is becoming impossible to ignore—even for some of Wall Street’s most persistent skeptics.
In a significant shift, DA Davidson has upgraded Nvidia from “neutral” to “buy” and raised its price target from $195 to $210 per share, suggesting roughly 18% upside from current levels. The move is a striking reversal from earlier this year, when the firm’s analysts projected as much as a 48% downside for the stock.
For advisors and RIAs monitoring the technology sector’s impact on portfolios, this upgrade highlights how dramatically the narrative around AI infrastructure—and Nvidia’s role in it—has evolved in just a matter of months.
A Change of View Driven by AI Demand
Gil Luria, head of technology research at DA Davidson, and his team explained that their more constructive stance stems from “increasingly optimistic” expectations for AI compute demand. Previously, the group had warned that hyperscalers—mega-cap technology giants like Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta—could reach a peak in their capital expenditure cycles by 2026, creating risk for Nvidia’s growth trajectory.
They also cautioned that AI applications needed to mature in order to justify the billions flowing into Nvidia’s chips. Without significant use cases, their thesis was that AI-driven demand might fizzle after an initial wave of hype.
But six months have made a difference. Following Nvidia’s blockbuster second-quarter earnings report, the analysts acknowledged that their outlook had “shifted quite a bit” due to the rapid pace of adoption across industries. Hyperscalers are still ramping up spending, and there are no signs of a spending plateau on the horizon.
“The overwhelming growth in demand for compute is the only thing that matters,” the analysts wrote. In their view, Nvidia should be positioned to sustain strong growth over the next two years, regardless of where the spending originates.
Nvidia’s Market Position
For context, Nvidia has been the single most important beneficiary of the AI boom, with its high-performance GPUs powering the training and inference of large-scale AI models. The company’s ability to dominate both hardware and software ecosystems has created a near-monopoly dynamic in certain areas of AI computing.
This year alone, Nvidia shares are up more than 30%, adding to a record-setting multi-year run that has redefined its market value and influence. The firm is now one of the largest companies in the world by market capitalization, surpassing traditional tech titans that once defined the sector’s growth.
Despite concerns about valuations, most Wall Street analysts maintain “buy” ratings on Nvidia. For wealth advisors and portfolio managers, the question isn’t whether Nvidia is a leader—it’s whether the company can sustain growth at a pace that justifies current and future valuations.
Risks Still on the Radar
Luria’s team emphasized that they aren’t abandoning caution entirely. Several factors remain on their watchlist—elements that could create headwinds for Nvidia and, by extension, portfolios overweight in AI and semiconductor exposure.
1. Hyperscaler Capex Trends
While current spending continues to rise, the risk of a long-term slowdown remains. If cloud providers eventually rationalize or optimize spending, the magnitude of Nvidia’s growth opportunity could narrow.
2. Profit Margins and ROI in AI
It’s not yet clear how sustainable profit margins will be across the AI ecosystem. End-users and enterprise clients will eventually demand tangible returns on AI investments. If the technology fails to produce meaningful productivity gains, customers may scale back purchases, creating pressure on Nvidia’s pricing power.
3. Rising Competition
Nvidia’s lead is formidable, but it isn’t unassailable. ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) and GPU alternatives from competitors like AMD, Intel, or custom-designed chips from hyperscalers themselves could erode market share.
4. Physical and Infrastructure Constraints
Energy availability, power-hungry data centers, and supply chain bottlenecks could limit how fast AI infrastructure can expand. These constraints pose risks not just to Nvidia but to the entire AI industry.
5. Investor Sentiment
Perhaps the most subtle but impactful factor is “exuberant expectations.” As valuations rise, so does the burden of execution. Nvidia not only needs to meet growth projections but also consistently exceed them to maintain its market leadership premium.
Implications for RIAs and Wealth Advisors
For financial advisors, the evolution of DA Davidson’s position underscores the need for flexibility in managing client portfolios. Earlier this year, the firm’s bearish stance aligned with concerns many RIAs had about excessive valuations in AI-linked equities. Now, the upgrade suggests that the growth trajectory of AI infrastructure is powerful enough to overcome those earlier objections—at least for the foreseeable future.
Portfolio Construction Considerations
-
Diversification: While Nvidia remains central to the AI theme, advisors should be careful about concentration risk. A single-stock overweight, even in a dominant name, creates exposure to company-specific risks.
-
Sector Allocation: Consider balancing Nvidia exposure with positions in cloud providers, data center REITs, and companies supplying supporting infrastructure like semiconductors, energy systems, and networking equipment.
-
Time Horizon Alignment: Short-term volatility is inevitable given Nvidia’s valuation premium. Advisors should match AI-related allocations to client time horizons and risk tolerances, ensuring long-term investors can ride through potential drawdowns.
-
Monitoring Capital Expenditures: Hyperscaler spending is one of the most important leading indicators for Nvidia’s performance. Advisors may want to track quarterly updates from Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta alongside Nvidia’s earnings.
-
Alternative AI Plays: Beyond Nvidia, opportunities exist in software companies deploying AI solutions, enterprise cloud providers, and firms developing energy-efficient computing architectures.
Broader Context for the AI Investment Thesis
The DA Davidson upgrade also highlights how narratives in markets can shift quickly. Just months ago, skepticism dominated the outlook for AI-related investments, with many questioning whether capital expenditures were justified. Now, as adoption accelerates, even prior skeptics are recognizing that demand growth is reshaping the economics of the technology sector.
For advisors, this raises an important point: AI isn’t a narrow theme. It’s becoming a structural driver of technology investment, comparable to the early days of cloud computing or the internet buildout. Nvidia is currently the poster child for this trend, but the investment ecosystem is much broader.
The strategic question for RIAs is how to capture exposure in a way that balances opportunity and risk. A measured approach—leveraging diversified vehicles such as ETFs, sector funds, and carefully sized individual equity positions—may help mitigate the risks of exuberant expectations while still participating in secular growth.
The Bottom Line
DA Davidson’s move from skepticism to endorsement of Nvidia serves as a reminder of how fast AI is altering both corporate spending patterns and market sentiment. For wealth advisors, the key takeaway is that while risks remain—ranging from competition to infrastructure constraints—the sheer scale of compute demand is proving hard to bet against.
Advisors guiding clients through this landscape should keep a dual focus: capture the upside potential of AI-driven growth while preparing for volatility and structural bottlenecks that may arise.
In practice, that means maintaining disciplined portfolio construction, actively monitoring market developments, and helping clients understand that Nvidia’s trajectory, while impressive, is only part of a much larger AI investment story.
At the end of the day, the upgrade isn’t just about one stock. It’s about recognizing that AI has moved from a speculative narrative to a core driver of capital investment—and wealth advisors need to be positioning client portfolios accordingly.
